Last mentioned: 2h ago
CIT Implementation
The Court of International Trade is expected to set procedures for duty recovery.
Trade Investigations
The administration will conduct investigations into unfair trade practices to establish permanent tariffs.
Implementation
Tariffs expected to take effect at U.S. ports of entry.
10% Global Tariff
Implementation of a 10% across-the-board tariff for a 150-day period.
SCOTUS Ruling
Supreme Court invalidates the global tariffs in a 6-3 decision.
White House Pivot
Administration announces a new 10% worldwide tariff and vows to fight refunds.
SCOTUS Ruling
Supreme Court declares IEEPA tariffs unconstitutional in a 6-3 decision.
Administration Response
President Trump announces intent to litigate the refund process.
Tariff Implementation
President imposes reciprocal and drug-trafficking tariffs using IEEPA emergency powers.
Liberation Day
President Trump expands tariffs to dozens of global trading partners using IEEPA.
Appellate Review
Expected window for the U.S. government to appeal the decision to a higher court.
Implementation Phase
Expected start date for the collection of the new 10% duties at U.S. ports of entry.
Refund Filings
Expected surge in administrative protests and lawsuits to reclaim paid duties.
Implementation Phase
Expected timeframe for the formal revision of U.S. export control regulations for Vietnam.
Refund Litigation
Expected period of prolonged legal battles over duty recovery for importers.
Surcharge Expiration
The 150-day temporary surcharge period under Section 122 is set to expire unless renewed or replaced.
Projected Expiration
The 150-day statutory limit for Section 122 tariffs is reached unless extended by Congress.
Statutory Expiration
Expected expiration of the 150-day temporary tariff window unless renewed or altered.
Projected Implementation
Earliest expected date for new trade barriers to take effect following regulatory review.
Original Implementation
The original target date for the deal to take effect (now delayed).
The US Supreme Court has struck down emergency tariffs implemented by the Trump administration, providing immediate relief to major trading partners. China and India, previously the primary targets of these levies, are positioned to regain market share as trade barriers dissolve.
India and the United States have indefinitely postponed high-level trade negotiations following a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that shifts tariff-setting authority to Congress. The delay, coupled with a new 15% universal tariff imposed by the Trump administration, threatens the timeline for an interim trade pact originally slated for April implementation.
The U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated the administration's use of emergency powers to impose broad trade tariffs, prompting President Trump to immediately announce a 15% global tariff. Simultaneously, high-stakes nuclear negotiations with Iran are reaching a critical juncture in Geneva against the backdrop of a massive U.S. military buildup.
Following a Supreme Court ruling that struck down previous import taxes, President Trump has pivoted to a rarely used trade law to impose a 15% global tariff. This temporary measure, effective February 24, creates immediate cost pressures for global supply chains and sets a five-month countdown for Congressional intervention.
The European Commission is urging the United States to uphold a bilateral trade agreement following President Trump's decision to implement a 15% global import duty. This move comes immediately after a US Supreme Court ruling against the administration's use of emergency powers for tariffs, creating significant volatility for international supply chains.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed that specific bilateral trade agreements remain in effect despite a recent Supreme Court ruling against the administration's broader tariff policies. This provides a critical layer of certainty for supply chain managers navigating a volatile regulatory landscape.
Despite a landmark Supreme Court ruling limiting executive authority over trade barriers, President Trump is leveraging alternative statutory mechanisms to keep tariffs in place. This maneuver creates a complex legal landscape for global supply chains and signals a continued commitment to protectionist trade policies regardless of judicial oversight.
The European Union has formally called on the United States to respect established trade agreements following a landmark court ruling that blocked several of President Trump's recently imposed tariffs. This development introduces a period of legal uncertainty for transatlantic logistics and supply chain managers who must now navigate a shifting regulatory landscape.
The Australian government is evaluating retaliatory measures and diplomatic options following US President Donald Trump’s imposition of a 15% blanket tariff on foreign imports. Canberra has characterized the move as unjustified, signaling a potential rift in the long-standing Australia-US trade relationship.
A landmark judicial ruling against trade tariffs imposed by the Trump administration has introduced significant volatility into US-China relations. This decision forces logistics and procurement leaders to re-evaluate cost structures and long-term sourcing strategies amidst a shifting legal landscape.
New tariff proposals from the Trump administration threaten to erode the historical trade advantages enjoyed by Australian exporters in the U.S. market. As global supply chains brace for renewed protectionism, the potential loss of exemptions could force a significant realignment of Australian trade flows and logistics strategies.
President Trump has unilaterally raised the global import duty to 15%, bypassing a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated his previous trade policy. The new temporary measure targets nearly all US imports for a 150-day period, creating immediate volatility for global supply chains.
President Trump has increased his proposed global tariff from 10% to 15%, utilizing Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to bypass a recent Supreme Court setback. This temporary measure lasts 150 days, creating immediate volatility for global supply chains as the administration seeks more permanent legal avenues for its protectionist agenda.
The Supreme Court has affirmed the President's broad authority to impose universal tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This landmark decision cements the 10% baseline tariff, forcing a permanent shift in global sourcing and nearshoring strategies for U.S. importers.
President Trump has officially raised the universal global tariff rate to 15%, a move that fundamentally alters the cost structure of international trade. This policy shift is expected to trigger widespread supply chain restructuring and significant inflationary pressure on imported goods.
President Trump has announced an immediate increase in baseline global tariffs from 10% to 15%, signaling a significant escalation in protectionist trade policy. The move triggers immediate cost pressures across global supply chains and sets the stage for further regulatory adjustments in the coming months.
A Russian-flagged tanker carrying refined fuels is currently transiting toward Cuba, marking the first direct maritime challenge to the Trump administration's reinstated blockade. The shipment arrives as Cuba's energy grid nears collapse, setting the stage for a high-stakes geopolitical confrontation in the Caribbean.
The Trump administration has announced plans to remove Vietnam from its restricted technology list, signaling a significant shift in U.S.-Vietnam trade relations. This move is expected to facilitate high-tech exports and strengthen supply chain ties as Vietnam emerges as a critical alternative to Chinese manufacturing.
A judicial ruling challenging executive tariff authority has triggered aggressive countermoves by the Trump administration, creating a period of intense uncertainty for global supply chains. Logistics leaders are now forced to navigate a fragmented regulatory landscape as the executive branch seeks new legal avenues to maintain its protectionist trade agenda.
Following a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling declaring his 'reciprocal tariffs' illegal, President Trump asserted that trade terms with India remain unchanged. The administration is reportedly seeking alternative legal pathways to maintain the tariff structure despite the court's finding that the executive exceeded its authority under the IEEPA.