Procurement Neutral 5 Based on a press release

Construction Firms Risk Digitizing Inefficiency with Poor CMS Selection

· 3 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • New research from Info-Tech Research Group warns that construction firms are failing to realize digital transformation benefits by selecting management systems that don't align with operational realities.
  • This trend is leading to the 'digitization of inefficiency,' where broken manual processes are automated rather than optimized.

Mentioned

Info-Tech Research Group company AEC Industry technology

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Info-Tech Research Group identifies poor CMS selection as a primary driver of failed digital transformation in construction.
  2. 2The 'digitization of inefficiency' occurs when broken manual workflows are automated without prior process optimization.
  3. 3Construction productivity has remained stagnant for decades compared to the manufacturing sector.
  4. 4Poor software adoption at the field level leads to inaccurate data reporting and fragmented silos.
  5. 5Successful CMS implementation requires stakeholder buy-in from site foremen and field crews during the procurement phase.
Industry Digital Maturity

Who's Affected

Project Managers
personNegative
Field Crews
personNegative
IT Departments
companyNegative
Software Vendors
companyPositive

Analysis

The construction sector, a $12 trillion global industry, has historically been one of the least digitized sectors, second only to agriculture. As firms finally embrace digital transformation, a new and more insidious problem has emerged: the digitization of inefficiency. According to a new report from Info-Tech Research Group, many construction firms are investing heavily in Construction Management Systems (CMS) that fail to deliver promised productivity gains because they are layered on top of fundamentally broken processes.

The core of the issue lies in the procurement and selection process. Construction executives often approach CMS selection as a technical checklist rather than a strategic overhaul of project delivery. When a firm selects a platform based on high-level executive reporting features while ignoring the friction it creates for a site foreman, the result is a data desert. Field workers, finding the software cumbersome, often revert to paper or spreadsheets, leaving the expensive CMS with incomplete or inaccurate data. This creates a disconnect between the job site and the head office, leading to the very delays and cost overruns the software was intended to prevent.

The construction sector, a $12 trillion global industry, has historically been one of the least digitized sectors, second only to agriculture.

From a supply chain perspective, the implications are significant. Construction projects are complex logistical puzzles involving thousands of SKUs, multiple subcontractors, and tight delivery windows. An ineffective CMS disrupts the visibility of material requirements and labor scheduling. If a CMS cannot accurately track real-time progress, procurement teams cannot time the arrival of high-value components like HVAC units or structural steel. This leads to either site congestion—where materials arrive too early and are at risk of damage—or project standstills where labor sits idle waiting for deliveries. The lack of a cohesive digital thread across the supply chain remains a primary driver of the industry's stagnant productivity.

Furthermore, the digitization of inefficiency exacerbates the industry's existing data silo problem. Info-Tech’s research suggests that when software is poorly selected, it often fails to integrate with existing ERP or BIM (Building Information Modeling) tools. This lack of interoperability means that data must be manually re-entered across different systems, increasing the risk of human error and ensuring that a single source of truth remains an elusive goal. For the broader logistics industry, which relies on the timely completion of infrastructure to maintain global trade flows, these systemic inefficiencies in construction represent a persistent bottleneck.

What to Watch

To reverse this trend, Info-Tech advocates for a shift toward human-centric digital procurement. This involves mapping every manual workflow—from Request for Information (RFI) submittals to change orders—before a single software demo is viewed. Firms must identify where the friction exists in their current manual state and select a CMS specifically designed to lubricate those points. Success in construction digitization is not measured by the number of features in a software suite, but by the percentage of field staff who actually use the tool to record their daily activities.

Looking ahead, the construction industry faces mounting pressure from rising material costs and labor shortages. Digitization is no longer optional, but the margin for error in technology investment has narrowed. Firms that continue to digitize the mess will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage compared to digital-first contractors who use technology to fundamentally redesign how buildings are made. The next three years will likely see a shakeout where firms with high digital debt from poor CMS choices are forced to reinvest or face obsolescence.

Sources

Sources

Based on 2 source articles

How we covered this story

Every story in our supply chain coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the supply chain space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.